Victor Leon Case Ties Illegal Immigration to Workers’ Comp Law

The case of a paralyzed worker is compromised by worker's immigration status and compounded by his use of illicit drugs.

Being an illegal immigrant and getting hurt on the job proved a miserable combination for Victor Leon. He also compounded his predicament by using illicit drugs, although these substances almost certainly played no role in his workplace injury.

Leon was working on a construction project for Altec Roofing in Palm City when he fell off the roof of a three-story building. As a result of the accident, he was permanently paralyzed.

Prior to his unfortunate accident, he'd informed Altec about his illegal immigration status. Altec had even helped him to obtain a fraudulent social security number. But while he was accepted as a worker by the company, being accepted as "an injured worker" eligible for workers’ compensation was another matter. Still, he should still be eligible. Using a fake social security number to secure employment doesn't mean that he has to forfeit workers’ compensation for an on-the-job accident. He would have had to make a false statement after being injured "for the purpose of securing workers’ compensation benefits" before the ultimate sanction of forfeiture may be imposed. So just because Leon is an illegal immigrant, he can't forfeit his right to workers' compensation benefits.

Unfortunately, Leon had another complication crop up. A post-accident drug test revealed the presence of cocaine and marijuana in his bloodstream. Section 440.9 (3) of Florida law states that workers' compensation benefits for an otherwise compensable mishap are not payable if the injury "was occasioned primarily … by the influence of any drugs … not prescribed by a physician." Section 440.9 (7) (b) creates a presumption that the injury was occasioned primarily by the drug when a post-accident test for drugs is positive.

Leon retained an expert who testified that the drugs in his bloodstream at the time of the accident did not actually impair him. But on bad advice, Leon decided to voluntarily dismiss a petition before the judge of compensation claims in favor of a little used estoppel argument. The outcome was a Florida circuit court granting Altec's motion for summary judgment. Leon may eventually obtain a remedy at a workers’ compensation forum, but this is highly unlikely.

Tony Francis is an Orlando personal injury lawyer. His practice specializes in being an Orlando accident lawyer helping innocent victims get compensation for their losses. To learn more about Orlando injury lawyer, Orlando personal injury lawyer, Orlando accident lawyer, Orlando injury attorney, visit Francislawgroup.com.

Construction Site Accidents Are Becoming Increasingly Common

Construction site accidents are becoming more common. But is workers’ comp law keeping pace?

Construction site accidents and related injuries are bound to receive additional scrutiny as Obama Stimulus disbursements jumpstarts additional 2009 construction projects under federal auspices. But lax safety procedures during the Bush Administration tenure also appear to have contributed to a substantial increase in such events since 2000. The increase in construction site accidents might have even begun to rise in the early 1990s.

Consider that in 2008, one in four workplace fatalities were construction workers. There were 1,225 fatal occupational injuries in 2001 involving a construction site; by 2008 that figure had risen to 2,889.

Examples of such tragedies are common.

· 55-year-old carpenter struck by a drunk driver while working on The Big Dig in Boston, multiple serious injuries resulting.
· 50-year-old union iron worker in Philadelphia fell down a darkened stairway when a temporary lighting system failed, multiple serious injuries resulting.
· 22-year-old self-employed roofer fell 25' off a sloped roof in Naples, Florida, permanent paralysis resulting.

Because only about 10% of construction companies employ more than 20 workers, most have no formal job safety regulations or programs in place.

In 1992, the "lost-workday" rate for workers in the construction industry was 5.7 per every 100 fulltime workers. In 2007, that rate had increased to 9.6 per 100 fulltime workers, an increase of nearly 40% making it the highest such rate of any major economic sector.

Yet jury verdicts in construction site accidents tend to produce modest settlements in favor of construction workers and other public sector workers compared to those accidents (less than $250,000) which involve non-workers (more than $500,000), even if the construction workers’ injuries were quite horrific. This discrepancy may partially be linked to a pro-corporate, pro-business trend in the weakening of workers’ compensation statutes which has been occurring in most "right-to-work" states since about 1990. In some cases, salaries of attorneys representing injured workers have been deliberately "capped" by state legislatures, possibly affecting the quality of legal counsel afforded to workers, especially those in the construction industry. A blatant example of such legislation is HB903, a measure passed on May 1, 2009, in Florida.

Tony Francis is an Orlando personal injury lawyer. His practice specializes in being an Orlando accident lawyer helping innocent victims get compensation for their losses. To learn more about Orlando injury lawyer, Orlando personal injury lawyer, Orlando accident lawyer, Orlando injury attorney, visit Francislawgroup.com.

Francis Law Firm Opposes Florida House Bill 903

Tony Francis of the Francis Law Firm is front and center against the controversial workers’ compensation bill, and he urges Governor Crist to veto it. There are some excellent reasons why.

On Friday, May 1, 2009, the Florida Legislature passed HB 903 dealing with workers' compensation. Tony Francis of the Francis Law Firm, and the Florida Justice Association (FJA), strongly opposed this unfair legislation. A fight was tirelessly waged throughout the legislative session to get the controversial bill either amended or killed. Last minute compromises failed and now the bill is headed to the governor for his signature.

The bill essentially prevents Florida's injured workers from finding an attorney willing to represent them in court. House Bill 903 creates an uneven playing field as injured workers are placed at a disadvantage because they are unable to pay their attorneys "reasonable compensation." The bill gives insurance companies a decidedly unfair advantage by encouraging bad claims handling practices and eliminating penalties for wrongfully denying claims.

Asserts Tony Francis of the Orlando-based Francis Law Firm, "Deletion of the word 'reasonable' will mean more litigation contesting the ability to access the courts to obtain wrongfully denied benefits by injured workers and first responders." Furthermore, without the obligation to pay a 'reasonable fee,' the insurance carrier "can keep on denying benefits and coerce injured workers into taking quick and unreasonable settlements," Francis argues. It's also a question of access. "Why is it considered okay to block the access to the courts for injured workers and first responders by capping attorney's fees when workers' compensation benefits are wrongfully denied?"

Francis places HB903 in the stark relief of a citizen perspective. "What's the upshot of all this? It's easy to see what will happen. Unable to recover the benefits they need for survival; injured workers will be left to the lottery-like applications required by social programs such as Medicaid to pay their bills. It's pretty obvious that the real bills will end up being paid by taxpayers, as is too often the case."

Wealthy insurance companies are the true beneficiaries of this ill-advised legislation. "The injured workers won't be getting their day in court, no matter how egregious the workplace might have been to cause accidents that in at least some cases, could have been prevented," Francis concludes.

To learn more about Orlando injury lawyer, Orlando personal injury lawyer, Orlando accident lawyer, Orlando injury attorney, visit Francislawgroup.com.

Francis Law Firm Takes Clear Stand on Controversial HB 903

Tony Francis, of the Orlando-based Francis Law Firm, is opposed to the Florida House Bill primarily because its repeal or veto is crucial to the rights of workers.

House Bill 903 is like the clock reversing direction into a past when workers rights were blithely ignored. Its passage on May 1, 2009, negates a previous Florida Supreme Court ruling and restores a cap on attorney's fees in workers' compensation cases. Headed for the desk of Florida Governor Charlie Crist after being passed by the Senate by a 22-16 vote, it appears that being paid "reasonably" for representing injured workers is a vestige of the past.

The October 2008 decision by the state's highest court involved a nurse who was injured lifting a patient at a nursing home. Her lawyer helped her win $3,344 in lost wages and medical expenses after her initial claim was denied. The law, ironically enough, limited the attorney's fee to about $8 an hour while the insurance company's lawyers were paid about $150 an hour. Tony Francis of the Orlando-based Francis Law Firm refuses to remain silent. "Last fall's Supreme Court decision was unfair. This bill would retrograde us back to a completely skewed playing field. What lawyer could afford to represent injured workers if HB903 becomes law? All we're asking for is a fair shake – not just for us, but for workers who get hurt. Why should insurance companies get to run the table?"

Francis has more to say about the controversial HB903. "This is what's called a 'bad bill,' and who does it hurt most? Who will fight insurers who refuse to pay doctor bills for workers hurt on the job?" Florida Justice Association spokeswoman Jacqui Sisto agrees, "This version of the bill is greatly unfair to Florida's injured workers and first responders." She added that it may even face a constitutional challenge. Francis adds fuel to this argument. "Deletion of the word 'reasonable' will mean continued litigation over who gets to access the courts to obtain wrongfully denied benefits for injured workers and first responders," he says. But one of the eventualities that Francis perceives is increased costs passed on to taxpayers. "What's going to happen when injured workers, after being denied deserved benefits and recovered losses, are forced to seek help from social programs such as Medicaid to pay their bills, especially if they're unable to return to work for an extended period? It will mean that taxpayers will eventually be footing their bills – bills that might well have been paid by insurance carriers if the workers had been able to get decent legal representation in the first place."

To learn more about Orlando injury lawyer, Orlando personal injury lawyer, Orlando accident lawyer, Orlando injury attorney, visit Francislawgroup.com.